<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Excel 2010 User Interface: &#8220;Is there any chance it will improve?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://exceluser.com/blog/178/excel-2010-user-interface-is-there-any-chance-it-will-improve.html/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://exceluser.com/blog/178/excel-2010-user-interface-is-there-any-chance-it-will-improve.html</link>
	<description>Insight for business users of Microsoft Excel</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 29 Oct 2011 04:37:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charley Kyd</title>
		<link>http://exceluser.com/blog/178/excel-2010-user-interface-is-there-any-chance-it-will-improve.html/comment-page-1#comment-14</link>
		<dc:creator>Charley Kyd</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 02:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exceluser.com/blog/?p=178#comment-14</guid>
		<description>Jon,

Here&#039;s a test that someone ought to do:

a. Put ten decipherable icons in a dialog and ask users to click on specific functions from a random list that repeats the functions five times each.
b. Put the function text in a menu and have users click from the same random list.
c. Mix icons and function text in a horizontal array much like a Ribbon, and have them click as instructed.

Finally, compare the average click times and accuracy under each of the three conditions.

I suspect the menu would win and the Ribbon-like pattern would be last. But that&#039;s only a guess.

Charley</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jon,</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a test that someone ought to do:</p>
<p>a. Put ten decipherable icons in a dialog and ask users to click on specific functions from a random list that repeats the functions five times each.<br />
b. Put the function text in a menu and have users click from the same random list.<br />
c. Mix icons and function text in a horizontal array much like a Ribbon, and have them click as instructed.</p>
<p>Finally, compare the average click times and accuracy under each of the three conditions.</p>
<p>I suspect the menu would win and the Ribbon-like pattern would be last. But that&#8217;s only a guess.</p>
<p>Charley</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jon Peltier</title>
		<link>http://exceluser.com/blog/178/excel-2010-user-interface-is-there-any-chance-it-will-improve.html/comment-page-1#comment-13</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Peltier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 13:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://exceluser.com/blog/?p=178#comment-13</guid>
		<description>The icons are very attractive, yet a priori I cannot decipher what they may indicate. Actually, a few are obvious, like Paste Formulas, Paste Transpose, Paste Link, Paste Picture, and Paste Picture Link. Five of 14, not a great ratio. I don&#039;t know why they couldn&#039;t have kept the list of text labels, and decorate them if they really had to with the icons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The icons are very attractive, yet a priori I cannot decipher what they may indicate. Actually, a few are obvious, like Paste Formulas, Paste Transpose, Paste Link, Paste Picture, and Paste Picture Link. Five of 14, not a great ratio. I don&#8217;t know why they couldn&#8217;t have kept the list of text labels, and decorate them if they really had to with the icons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

